Skip to content

Bump jackson to 2.19.0 #6354

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

RanVaknin
Copy link
Contributor

Bumping Jackson dependencies to 2.19.0

@RanVaknin RanVaknin added the changelog-not-required Indicate changelog entry is not required for a specific PR label Aug 18, 2025
@RanVaknin RanVaknin requested a review from a team as a code owner August 18, 2025 21:06
@RanVaknin RanVaknin added the no-api-surface-area-change Indicate there is no API surface area change and thus API surface area review is not required label Aug 18, 2025
@@ -46,6 +47,7 @@ public final class JsonNodeParser {
*/
public static final JsonFactory DEFAULT_JSON_FACTORY =
JsonFactory.builder()
.enable(StreamReadFeature.INCLUDE_SOURCE_IN_LOCATION)
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

jackson 2.16.0 introduced a behavior change where this behavior was true and now defaults to false. This caused our test to break.

In order to maintain the same behavior we have to manually enable this config.

more info FasterXML/jackson-core#1038

Copy link

Copy link
Contributor

@Fred1155 Fred1155 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Version change PR requires changelog

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
changelog-not-required Indicate changelog entry is not required for a specific PR no-api-surface-area-change Indicate there is no API surface area change and thus API surface area review is not required
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants